Katie Holmes’ family enraged by Australia trip
Katie Holmes‘ family is reportedly outraged at Katie’s devotion to fiancĂ© Tom Cruise and her punishing travelling-schedule.
US magazine Star is reporting that Katie had promised her parents that she wouldn’t accompany Tom to Kerry Packer’s memorial service in Australia earlier this month.
But then, to refute allegations that their relationship was in trouble, heavily pregnant Katie joined Tom for the 28-hour round trip.
A source close to the family has revealed that “Katie asked her mom not to tell [her father] Martin [about the trip] but Kathy insisted and passed the phone.”
“He hit the roof! He told Katie he thought she was endangering the baby’s health, as well as her own.”
Once in Sydney, the couple publicly (if somewhat uncomfortable) displayed that they were still very much an item, leaving Katie with very little time to relax.
Between trips to Australia and thrice-daily visits to her local Scientology church, it looks like Katie’s last few weeks of pregnancy will be far from restful ones…













Comments
# Deb on February 27th, 2006 at 9:26 pm
The whole relationship has just been about Tom being out to prove one thing or another.
He repeatedly sticks his tongue down his throat therfore he isn’t gay.
He impregnates her therefore he is neither gay or barren.
She goes over to Scientology therefore he isn’t crazy, it’s a legitmate religion.
She accompanies to Australia therefore they aren’t splitting up.
No wonder her parents are pissed.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Ythrj on May 20th, 2007 at 8:20 pm
helloy
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# boolooONtomkat on March 3rd, 2006 at 7:19 pm
Deb-a bit touchy are we? When you are a celebrity, gossip becomes a part of your life. You love it…admit it.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Deb on March 4th, 2006 at 12:57 am
Booloo: if you’re suggesting that I’m touchy and over-reacting to this because my boyfriend-then-fiancee (ab)used our relationship to advance his own career and prove he wasn’t gay, sterile and that Scientology was a perfectly normal religion - well, if you’re doing that you’re wrong.
Because he wasn’t a Scientologist. He was a Mormon. So you know, COMPLETELY DIFFERENT SITUATION.
:)
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# boolooONtomkat on March 6th, 2006 at 10:19 pm
Um…
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# oxy on April 29th, 2006 at 7:02 am
oh who cares…..
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Dr C on May 6th, 2006 at 2:26 am
How sad. How very, very sad, that KATIE Holmes is losing her faith, her identity, her soul. She is smitten, not in love it seems to me. When I see her, she looks like she is star-struck and idolizes the older man/actor/celeb. I hope she frees herself from the chains that bind, soon!
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# betty on May 20th, 2006 at 4:49 am
Dr C I totally agree! I predict her smitten-ness will fade with time. I hope we get the old Katie back. I don’t like the Katie I’ve seen since she’s been with Cruise, and I think her parents would agree.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# casino on August 2nd, 2006 at 4:16 am
unqualified firsts groaners shill replaces dabbler?viruses .
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# win on August 14th, 2006 at 11:30 am
cunning.governance precipitateness automating Sergei embrace certification berne
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
For more discussion about your favourite celebrities, visit the Fametastic Forums »
Leave a Reply