Michael Jackson spotted dressed as a woman
Michael Jackson was reportedly spotted wearing figure-hugging jeans, a woman’s blouse, high heels and a floppy hat in St Tropez yesterday - with his similarly clad eight year old daughter, Paris, in tow.
An onlooker told the Mirror: “I almost fell over in shock. He looked so feminine. It was as if he’s had a sex change. It was so bizarre.”
Another added: “He looked very, very odd.”
Michael is believed to be staying in the resort as a guest of his friend and benefactor Price Alwaleed, the nephew of King Fahd of Saudia Arabia.
It is the third time Michael has been spotted in feminine clothing this year: he wore an abaya during a trip to Bahrain in January and arrived in Ireland over the summer, wrapped in scarves and headscarves.
UPDATE: This has now been retracted by the original source of the photographs - it wasn’t Michael after all apparently.













Comments
# tina on October 12th, 2006 at 7:52 pm
No, it is not him. The Daily News retracted the article and said it was a mistake
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# zoe on October 13th, 2006 at 9:43 am
heya i do think that could have been jacko but then again it could have been he has so far had gone from black to white so why wouldnt he go from a male to female?
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Dominic on October 13th, 2006 at 11:20 am
i think you should shut up. he’s not a man nor can he help having a skin disease.
besides do you have something against peole who cross dress or are transgendered???
yer it hink you just might.
well leave them the f**k alone.
they love living like that, you might think it’s “not the right way” nbecuase of political or religious reasons, but just get a life and stay out of other peoples.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Dominic on October 13th, 2006 at 11:16 am
i think this is discusting.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# golddigger on August 6th, 2008 at 3:28 pm
so u have something against freedom, do you?
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Dominic on October 13th, 2006 at 11:18 am
michael jackson should be left alone, he’s inncoent untill proven guilty which will NEVER HAPPEN!!!
christ why do the media have to be such pig’s?
i think they’re just jealous of his fame and fortune.
LEAVE HIM ALONE!!!!
Dominic.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Sonal Nayee on October 23rd, 2006 at 4:13 pm
Wow, I absolutely agree with you, I mean what the hell is up with all this c**p, the media, the haters I dunno. But he def. needs to be left alone, it’s such a shame because he is such a great artist and innocent on top of that.
sonal
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Charles Thomson on October 14th, 2006 at 4:47 pm
It has already been confirmed that these photographs are not of Michael Jackson.
These photographs were taken in France, whereas Jackson has been in Ireland for months on end.
The original source of these photographs has retracted their article and Jackson is gearing up to sue every newspaper who doesn’t follow suit. Which he should.
Usually newspapers post articles about Jackson which are clearly made up, but cannot be disproved either way. He can’t sue over a newspaper saying he said something, because he can’t prove he didn’t say it. He can’t sue over a newspaper saying he did something, because he can’t prove he didn’t do it.
I am a journalist and know how these b******s work. They’re slimey. They know every loophole. If he takes them to court and says “you can’t quote me on that, I never said it!” all they have to say it “prove it.”
How can you prove you never said something?
Furthermore, there are laws in place which state that a journalist never has to reveal their sources in a court of law. Thus, as long as they say “it came from a source,” they can never be caught out on it. They can write something on a piece of paper, then get a colleague to read it out loud. Then all they say is “a course close to the newspaper said…” and technically they aren’t lying. But most of them don’t even go to that much effort. They just concoct c**k-eyed stories and quotations on slow news days.
Fortunately for Jackson, this is one instance in which had can physically prove that the story is fiction and that those photographs are not of him. It’ll be refreshing to see him able to stand up against the yellow journalism that has plagued his career.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Ameen on October 16th, 2006 at 1:30 am
i salute you Charles Thomson …very well said
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# lauren on October 14th, 2006 at 6:02 pm
i think that publishing these photos was discusting. i am obssed with michael jackson and i think that he should be left alone. i agree with dominic
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# JANET JACKSON on October 14th, 2006 at 11:27 pm
thats just wrong that snot michael and this is janet jackson speaking thats not my brother so shut the f**k up.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# DODO on October 15th, 2006 at 5:37 pm
believe me this isn’t Michael he is busy recording his new album in Irland now .
please leave him alone .
i donot know how could these papers puplish these lies. shame on
we love u michael
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# sophie grant on October 15th, 2006 at 10:47 pm
oh come on we all know jakko is a weirdo. thats why we call him wacco jacco!!!! as much as i like his early music, that bauy is metal.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Emilié Fosse on October 16th, 2006 at 12:53 am
Why the hell do the media and certain shallow assh*les, like some people who have commented on this page, have to bug Michael all the time. That guy has been through hell and for the media to go around declaring rubbish, subjecting him to more hell, is just sick!
I wish people would have the respect to leave this poor man alone!
No matter what some people say Michael, your real fans are still out there supporting you, and I’m proud to say I’m one of them!
Emilié xxxx
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# deja on October 16th, 2006 at 4:32 am
Every1 who’s any1 knows that is not michael jackson. Ya’ll need 2 hop off his d**k. Notcie how the more you make fun of him the richer he gets, michael, one of your biggest fans speaking, …forgive..and..then.. SUE THEIR A*S.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# leeanne on November 17th, 2006 at 12:03 pm
wot the f**k is up with the papers y cant you’s just leave him alone and get out of his life thay always hav some thing to say abt wot he dose and half the time it is just bull s**t man he is the king of pop leave him alone f**k sake let him make a come bak in peace for once in his life just stay out of it !!
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Michelle Loudon on August 31st, 2007 at 1:00 am
What the hell was Michael Jackson wearing and why the hell would he want to change his sex I mean he should stay male and not female and if he was wearing high heels he would not be able to walk in them.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# samantha on April 22nd, 2008 at 1:45 am
micheal jackson was created equaly as the rest of us and if we in sult him that is c**p cuz send me an emai at http://www.samantha@yahoo.com saying u never in your life did any thing wrong may be not as bad as wut u see micheal jackson doing but preety bad. now im not saying micheal jackson was wearing high heels and doin what ever this reporter has siad about him but i am saying that reporters do change up things have you ever been interviewed by a reporter and said something and when you heard it again it was tottaly diferant then what you said beforewll i have. so how do we not know that a reporter was riding around down town and took a picture of a real wowmen and just in persanated micheal jackson??????
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
For more discussion about your favourite celebrities, visit the Fametastic Forums »
Leave a Reply