Victoria Beckham unhappy about US impact so far
Victoria Beckham is reportedly unhappy with her Brand Beckham US invasion progress after various rumoured deals fell through.
Victoria and family moved to Los Angeles in July after husband David Beckham signed a five year contract with the Los Angeles Galaxy football team. The family arrived in the US in a storm of publicity and Victoria is said to be displeased at how quickly the hubbub has died down.
A source close to the tabloid queen told the Daily Mail: “Things are not really going as she had planned.”
“Katie Holmes had been helping her with scripts and perfecting her acting but even that has not helped the situation.”
“Victoria has a small cameo in Ugly Betty. She wanted a much bigger role in that - and indeed a lead role in any show at all.”
“Victoria had hoped to be picking and choosing presenting roles too. She had wanted perhaps to guest host on Larry King - in the way that Heather Mills did. But that has not worked out either.”
“She had been hoping that the documentary about the Beckhams moving to America would be made into a series, but it was cut right back too.”
“Victoria had also set her sights on getting the cover of American Vogue but that too has proved elusive. Basically she pinned her hopes on offers of work coming flooding in but that just has not happened.”
Victoria is said to be putting her US domination plans on hold for the time being to concentrate on the Spice Girls reunion tour taking place in December and January. The girl group are set to release a new single and their Greatest Hits album in November.













Comments
# Mel on September 27th, 2007 at 1:08 pm
Makes yer weep, doesn’t it? She really must get it into her thick skull that she can’t do anything that rates the A-list. All she will do is make herself look more stupid and desperate.
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Se on September 27th, 2007 at 1:09 pm
Can’t someone take her to one side and explain?
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# emily on September 27th, 2007 at 2:23 pm
uuuuuuuuuuu smmmmmmmmmmmmmeeeeeeeeeeeeel !!!!!!!!!
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
# Me on October 30th, 2007 at 7:43 pm
Seriously who does she think she is? All she is is AN OVER-GLORIFIED WAG! Never knew that was what earned a person “entry” into the acting or journalism world… all she is is an overly arrogant, waste of a human being that lives a flash/showy life- as the NYP subtly put it: “an over-abundance of self-indulgence”!
She is DISGUSTING in appearance and more so in personality- who and what she potrays herself to be~!
Reply to this comment | Quote |
Some HTML allowed:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
For more discussion about your favourite celebrities, visit the Fametastic Forums »
Leave a Reply