Britney Spears has another visit with sons

Britney Spears has spent another three hours visit with her young sons after seeing them for the first time in nearly two months over the weekend.

Before Saturday’s visit, Britney hadn’t seen 2 year old Sean and 18 month old Jayden since the showdown at her Studio City home at the start of January but she has now been allowed to see them twice in three days. Both visits have taken place at her home, with a court-appointed monitor on hand as well as Britney’s dad and current conservator Jamie Spears, a bodyguard assigned to the boys by their father Kevin Federline and Britney’s psychologist.

An inside source told OK magazine that the sessions went “very well” despite all the people needed there to make them happen: “It’s a lot [of people], for sure. But if [Britney] really wants those kids back, she won’t complain about all the people looking over her shoulder.”

The visits are a result of an agreement between legal teams acting on behalf of Britney and her ex-husband Kevin and his lawyer Mark Vincent Kaplan said after yesterday’s visit that he hopes “these visitations with the boys will help to normalize the family environment.”

“Kevin has always been rooting for Britney to regain visitation. If these visits go well, they will ramp up over time.”

“Kevin would love to be able to have a parenting partner in helping to raise these kids.”

In related news, lawyers acting on behalf of Jamie Spears and co-conservator Andrew Wallet have filed more papers in an attempt to close down lawyer Jon Eardley’s attempt to push Britney’s case to the federal, rather than state, court level, citing civil rights violations.

Eardley is believed to be working on behalf of Britney’s currently-restrained former advisor Sam Lufti but he claims he was appointed by Britney herself on 12th February before her phone access was restricted.

In the papers filed yesterday, the conservators claim Eardley has missed key deadlines, failed to prove he has been appointed as an attorney by Britney or address the most fundamental legal aspects of his case. They have also demanded he reimburse $43,000 of legal fees they’ve run up in defending his challenge.