Well they couldn’t be anything but perfect cos their HRH Beckhams kids – on the face of it anyway. But underneath what right has she got to deny them of a perfectly normal life where they have the freedom to go to the park for the day or to school without being hassled, just to satisfy her greedy desires of wanting a celeb lifestyle & the millions of pounds in the bank that comes with it.

In years to come she may look back & realise the damage she has selfishly done but by then it will be too late for her kids.

what do u mean by a normal life and freedom?? if u r famous like dem how do u expect them to live a normal life?? she doesn ask the paparazzi 2 follow her around n she’s not greedy… she gets paid 2 do somefin that she is good at
get a life

Tietie

Please tell us exactly what she is good at – am I missing something here?
She’s the most boring, untalented, self indulgent person on this planet.

I hear the fashion designers in USA are praying she don’t wear their clothes as they think she’s a fashion libility.

Tietie,

Actually she does ask the Paparazzi to follow her & take photos – she sets it up beforehand, just so she looks good in the photos – she lets them know the location & details, then she’s all ready to start posing (pretending she don’t even know she’s being filmed) remember the skiing photos that were in the press – her in her designer gear & skies, that was just an excuse for a posing parade – looks good in the papers tho dunnit.

(She has admitted this herself on TV) – theres a lot people don’t know about VB & it ain’t all good.

How do you think she gets in the papers so often apparently looking her best – most of it don’t happen naturally – everything is cunningly planned out down to the last minute.

it’s good that she’s not categorising them at a young age and letting them decide on their own lives…

“brooklyn, you’ll take after daddy”

“romeo, you’ll take after mummy”

“and cruz, you’ll take after your real daddy because if you’re clever you can’t take after either of us”

It’s all about choice, if you choose to be a celeb you should be sensible and keep your kids completely out of the limelight.

It’s irresponsible to tell the whole world personal details on a regular basis about your kids, regularly expose them in public photo shoots and then wonder why chancers plan to kidnap them. She’s not protecting their well being and seems to be more concerned about her career progressing by using every possible asset to make it happen.

Tom Cruise is a bigger celeb than her but he’s never exposed his kids to the public, nor has Michael Douglas, or anyone else as even half as much.

If she is so desparate to keep taking all the crap from the public who dislike her, and is so stupid she can’t take the hint that her face is on the unpopular board, so be it, but she should not drag her kids thru it too.

C. Casey, you must be jelouse, because nobody talks that way who doesn’t havehuge jeolusy issues which stem from self esteem issues. By the by, what about Tom Crus’s big cover story about his daughter, Suri, on the cover of Vanity Fair. Plus Brad Pitt and Angelena Joli are bigger stars than her and they put their baby on the cover of a magazine. I’m not saying it’s right. But, Victoria loves her children and would never do anything to harm them.
Plus, Victoria keeps winning opinion poles. She was recently named the “yummiest mummy” and has recently recieved awards for fashion.

te

The HUGE difference between the greedy Beckhams & Angelina Joli is that Angela donates one third of her income to charity. Something the self indulgent Beckhams should do, but we all know they’re too greedy for that.

In addition to this, Angelina does not flaunt & overexpose herself, she leads a private life. She does a hell of a lot of charity work too. She is a lovely person & helps others because she is more than able to.

Cruise does not overexpose his private life either. I doubt if you’ll see much of Suri after Vanity Fair.

Most other stars are very careful about exposing their kids on a regular basis – the Beckhams are constantly doing it & then they are surprised when people try to kidnap them – it is not down to love, just common sense & responsibility. After all, what’s more important, your kids or your celebrity status?

You’re obviously a Beckham worshipper, not too many of those left anymore.

I hear the Beckhams have just built a £300K hedge in their back garden – whilst Vicky’s sister Louise & husband have lost £300K from their business being bankrupt. Vicky is refusing to help them or have anything to do with it – I guess the hedge is a bit more important than her sister & her kids being homeless – especially when you have £100 million in the bank, bit selfish that is.

Hey everyone… love reading all of your comments and I actually agree with alot of them, I also can’t stand VB— she epitomzes everything that is wrong with our society, (1) being anorexic=landing a handsome husband, (2) Having loads of $$$= Not having to actually parent/raise the children, (3) being “famous”= your full-time “job” is to shop, shop, shop and who cares about the bills- because your “advisers”/“accountants” take care of all that silly paperwork, etc… I agree if you are that “famous” you can well-afford to protect not parade your children in front of the world-wide media, which the Beckhams’ obviously do quite frequently. I read a really interesting article a little bit ago comparing the Beckhams’ and JK Rowling and how each have considerable wealth but view life quite differently—- for example while the Beckhams’ are spendthrifts, JK is more on the conservative side, whereas the Beckham boys’ are paraded around left and right, JK protects her children’s privacy and allows them to be children— they even attend public schools!

I guess I have had enough of this family being shoved down our throats for 10+ years… Can’t they honestly just Go Away?

S. Harvie— I hadn’t heard that story about VB’s sister… if true, it epitomizes to the fullest extent what a narcissitic worthless piece of crap VB truly is.