Fametastic Forums » Celebrity News

Heather Mills throws water over Paul McCartney's lawyer after verdict

fametastic-bot March 18, 2008 16:08
Heather Mills reportedly celebrated being awarded a divorce settlement of £24.3million yesterday by tipping a glass of water over the head of Paul McCartney’s lawyer. After entering with a bouffant hair do, Fiona Shackleton was spotted with a wet-look don’t when she left the Royal Courts of Justice in London…
Helen March 20, 2008 22:10
£15.8m might have been his initial offer but if you look at the judgment, you will see that Sir Paul offered Heather Mills a package worth £20m in December 2006, just seven months after they separated. This consisted of a £16.5m lump sum plus assets from the marriage (the house in Hove plus the house near Peasemarsh). The final settlement upped the offer to £24.3m because Heather sold the house near Peasemarsh to pay some debts (so money was included to buy another one). Not sure what the other £1.8m was for but her money was reduced on account of ‘reckless spending’ on her part (in an attempt to deliberately inflate her living costs to justify her case for a substantial settlement) and for wasting time and money on countless re-examination of the results of forensic examination of his wealth (which led to no change to the final figures) at a cost of £500,000 and £400,000 respectively.
Alison March 24, 2008 11:32
Heather Mills constantly refers to her disability and would appear to wallow in it as if it should earn her some respect. She cannot open her mouth without making herself sound ridiculous.
I read a short time ago that she is to employ someone to improve her image and speak for her, well I’m afraid the improvement has to come from within or it doesn’t mean a thing.
The woman appears to be a sandwich short of a picnic.
Sir R March 31, 2008 21:04
wrote:I’m wondering what kind of Moron you are my dear ,
or are you out of the same pig sty as your “friend” Heather Mills,
who’s positively the most repulsive person on earth, she’s no role model for her daughter ,
As far a Stella McCartney being a trusty ,why on earth shouldn’t she it’s her father’s money,
and had he listened to her in the first place, he wouldn’t of been in this sordid ,predicament to begin with,
Stella had a keen sense of what Heather was all about from the get go, Now I wonder why on earth should she hate Heather, Hello is the light on & nobody’s home,
you dumb cluck!
Heather shouldn’t of gotten any monies ,or the child to begin with, she ’s is an extortionist, and a thief,
she should be in prison,
amongst many many other disgusting adjectives,none which should be mentioned here,
Heather is the epitome of white trash,Now what do you say,
she planned & scammed till, she trapped a rich lonely man,at the most vulnerable time of his life,

trapped him,for his money, shame on her,that rotten s**t,
Sir CW Rob.
£15.8m might have been his initial offer but if you look at the judgment, you will see that Sir Paul offered Heather Mills a package worth £20m in December 2006, just seven months after they separated. This consisted of a £16.5m lump sum plus assets from the marriage (the house in Hove plus the house near Peasemarsh). The final settlement upped the offer to £24.3m because Heather sold the house near Peasemarsh to pay some debts (so money was included to buy another one). Not sure what the other £1.8m was for but her money was reduced on account of ‘reckless spending’ on her part (in an attempt to deliberately inflate her living costs to justify her case for a substantial settlement) and for wasting time and money on countless re-examination of the results of forensic examination of his wealth (which led to no change to the final figures) at a cost of £500,000 and £400,000 respectively.

Reply to this post

You need to be logged in to reply to this post. Join here in just a few seconds.

/body>